均衡-编码的问题
12-16
论文里有这句话:
Finally it is to mention that a combination of channel coding (Viterbi Decoding) and DFE did not lead to a performance gain compared to channel coding and linear equalization. It is well known that this combination represents a critical one...
以前没注意到这个问题,那么这里的critical one什么含义?有什么简单的解释为什么DFE+编码不比LE+编码好么?
谢谢。
Finally it is to mention that a combination of channel coding (Viterbi Decoding) and DFE did not lead to a performance gain compared to channel coding and linear equalization. It is well known that this combination represents a critical one...
以前没注意到这个问题,那么这里的critical one什么含义?有什么简单的解释为什么DFE+编码不比LE+编码好么?
谢谢。
有什么看法都请指教一下,想不明白。关键他还来了个well known, 太打击人了。
这谁写的论文啊
啥玩意这是
“Decision feedback equalization for a single carrier system with frequency domain equalization - an overall system approach”ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/9656/30513/01407202.pdf?arnumber=1407202
我在别的地方问,有人告知他仿时域proakis channel B也是类似结论,引入交织性能在high SNR处改善也不大。作者的话应该是对的,就是我不知道道理何在
dfe是反馈的结构
在低snr区域会有比较严重的误差传播,性能加了可能更糟糕,这个和编码的特性是同向的
而linear equalizer虽然性能总体(?)不如dfe但是表现在低snr下是要好于dfe的
这个可能就是channel coding &dfe critical的意思吧
相关文章:
- OFDM需要均衡吗?(05-08)
- 请问自适应均衡在实际无线接收机中应用多吗?(05-08)
- 请问无线通信中的均衡器如何实现?(05-08)
- Re: 均衡仿真的问题(05-08)
- 请问均衡滤波器电路是怎么实现的(05-08)
- 请教ADSL中为什么要进行时域均衡?(05-08)
射频专业培训教程推荐